Why month-end close takes longer than expected

Month-end close takes longer than expected because data is spread across multiple systems, manual steps introduce errors and teams have to wait for each other before they can continue. The result is a chain reaction of corrections, re-entry and delayed approvals that happens again every month. In this article, we answer the most common questions about why this process is so stubborn and what you can do about it.

The steps in the process that take the most time

The biggest time sinks in month-end close are collecting and combining data from different sources, manually checking figures and waiting for input from other departments. Together, these three steps are responsible for most of the delay in most organisations.

In practice, it looks like this: a finance employee exports data from the ERP system, copies it into an Excel file, adds data from another system and sends the result by email to a colleague for checking. Every manual transfer is a moment when something can go wrong. Versions get mixed up, formulas contain errors and nobody knows for sure which file is the latest one.

In addition, reconciling intercompany transactions, processing outstanding items and preparing management reports structurally take more time than planned. Not because people work too slowly, but because the processes themselves have been set up in an unnecessarily complex way.

The reason something goes wrong again every month

Something goes wrong again every month because month-end close largely depends on manual actions that are error-prone and on information that is not automatically synchronised between systems. As long as people transfer data by hand, errors will keep coming back.

The issue is not the people, but the structure. When a sales order is in the CRM system but still has to be transferred manually to accounting, there is always a chance that step is forgotten, happens too late or includes a typo. The same logic applies to timesheets, purchase invoices and stock movements.

Many teams also work with implicit knowledge: one person knows how a specific correction should be made, but it is not documented anywhere. If that same person is absent, the process gets stuck. That makes month-end close not only a technical issue, but also an organisational risk.

The difference between a fast and slow month-end close

The difference between a fast and slow month-end close lies in the level of automation, the quality of the data integrations and the clarity of responsibilities. Organisations that complete month-end close quickly have connected their systems and work with standardised processes.

Characteristics of a fast month-end close

  • Data flows automatically from source systems to the reporting environment
  • Responsibilities and deadlines are clear to everyone
  • Checks are automated and flag deviations immediately
  • There is one central place where all current figures come together

Characteristics of a slow month-end close

  • Data is copied manually between systems and files
  • Employees wait for input from colleagues before they can continue
  • Errors are discovered late, making correction rounds necessary
  • Reports are prepared only after the close, not during it

The difference is rarely a matter of adding more people. Organisations with a fast month-end close have deliberately invested in the infrastructure behind the process, not only in the people who carry it out.

How automation can shorten month-end close

Automation shortens month-end close by eliminating repetitive, manual steps and making data available in real time. Instead of employees collecting, checking and forwarding data, this happens automatically at the moment a transaction takes place.

In concrete terms, this means connecting systems through API integrations, so information no longer has to be transferred manually. A new sales order in the CRM is automatically passed on to accounting. An approved purchase invoice is processed immediately without an employee having to intervene.

The effect is twofold. First, the errors caused by manual entry disappear. Second, employees no longer have to wait for data from other departments, because that data is already available. Month-end close then shifts from an intensive sprint week to a process that runs continuously throughout the month and only has to be checked and approved at the end.

When a BI dashboard is the right solution

A BI dashboard is the right solution when month-end close needs to be not only faster, but also more transparent. If the issue is that figures are available too late and decision-makers cannot steer in time, a dashboard provides real-time insight into the KPIs that matter.

A BI dashboard does not solve process errors that sit deeper in the data chain. But if the data is already reliable and the bottleneck is in the presentation and accessibility of information, then a dashboard is a powerful instrument. Managers no longer have to wait for a monthly report that is prepared after the close. They can see the current state of affairs at any moment.

The right timing for a BI dashboard is therefore when:

  • The underlying data is already reliable and structured
  • Several people need the same overview
  • Decisions are now being made too late because reports are delayed
  • There is a need for one central place for all financial and operational KPIs

If the data itself is still unreliable or fragmented across systems, it is smarter to get the data integrations in order first before investing in visualisation.

How Eenvoud helps with a faster month-end close

We help organisations shorten month-end close structurally by tackling the cause: fragmented data and manual processes. In concrete terms, we do that by:

  • Connecting systems through custom API integrations, so data flows automatically and without errors between ERP, CRM, accounting and other tools
  • Using microservices that automate specific tasks, such as generating reports or flagging deviations
  • Building BI dashboards that provide real-time insight into the KPIs that are relevant to your organisation
  • Creating a central data source, so everyone always works with the same, current figures

The result is a month-end close that takes less time, contains fewer errors and provides more insight. Want to know what is possible in your situation? Get in touch and we will look at the best approach together.

Let’s talk

Every good solution starts with a conversation.

Have a question about something you read here? Get in touch - we’re happy to talk it through.